You are here
Benefit or Burden? On the Intergenerational Inequity of Teacher Pension Plans
Most public school teachers in the United States are enrolled in defined benefit (DB) pension plans. Using administrative micro data from four states, combined with national pension funding data, we show these plans have accumulated substantial unfunded liabilities – effectively debt – owing to previous plan operations. On average across state plans, over 10 percent of current teachers’ earnings are being set aside to pay for previously-accrued pension liabilities. This amounts to a large reduction in real operating spending per student. Our findings make clear that a significant fraction of the resources allocated toward teacher compensation in current public education budgets is not being invested in resources to educate today’s students at all.
August 2016 Update; Originally posted November 2015
Keywords: Teacher Pension, Finance, Retirement
Citation: Benjamin Backes, Dan Goldhaber, Cyrus Grout, Cory Koedel, Shawn Ni, Michael Podgursky, P. Brett Xiang, Zeyu Xu (2016). Benefit or Burden? On the Intergenerational Inequity of Teacher Pension Plans. CALDER Working Paper No. 148
You May Also Be Interested In
Should I Stay or Should I Go (Later)? Teacher Intentions and Turnover in Low-Performing Schools and Districts Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Erica Harbatkin, Tuan Nguyen, Katharine O. Strunk, Jason Burns, Alex Moran
ESSER Funding and School System Jobs: Evidence from Job Posting Data
Dan Goldhaber, Grace Falken, Roddy Theobald
How Predictive of Teacher Retention Are Ratings of Applicants from Professional References?
Dan Goldhaber, Cyrus Grout
See other working papers on:
Research Area: Educator preparation and teacher labor markets