You are here
Benefit or Burden? On the Intergenerational Inequity of Teacher Pension Plans
Most public school teachers in the United States are enrolled in defined benefit (DB) pension plans. Using administrative micro data from four states, combined with national pension funding data, we show these plans have accumulated substantial unfunded liabilities – effectively debt – owing to previous plan operations. On average across state plans, over 10 percent of current teachers’ earnings are being set aside to pay for previously-accrued pension liabilities. This amounts to a large reduction in real operating spending per student. Our findings make clear that a significant fraction of the resources allocated toward teacher compensation in current public education budgets is not being invested in resources to educate today’s students at all.
August 2016 Update; Originally posted November 2015
Keywords: Teacher Pension, Finance, Retirement
Citation: Benjamin Backes, Dan Goldhaber, Cyrus Grout, Cory Koedel, Shawn Ni, Michael Podgursky, P. Brett Xiang, Zeyu Xu (2016). Benefit or Burden? On the Intergenerational Inequity of Teacher Pension Plans. CALDER Working Paper No. 148
You May Also Be Interested In
School District Job Postings and Staffing Challenges Throughout the Second School Year During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Dan Goldhaber, Nate Brown, Nathaniel Marcuson, Roddy Theobald
Out of the Gate, but Not Necessarily Teaching: A Descriptive Portrait of Early-Career Earnings for Those Who Are Credentialed to Teach
Dan Goldhaber, John Krieg, Stephanie Liddle, Roddy Theobald
Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? An Analysis of Pension Structure and Retirement Timing
Dan Goldhaber, Cyrus Grout, Kristian Holden, Josh McGee
See other working papers on:
Research Area: Educator preparation and teacher labor markets