You are here
Benefit or Burden? On the Intergenerational Inequity of Teacher Pension Plans
Most public school teachers in the United States are enrolled in defined benefit (DB) pension plans. Using administrative micro data from four states, combined with national pension funding data, we show these plans have accumulated substantial unfunded liabilities – effectively debt – owing to previous plan operations. On average across state plans, over 10 percent of current teachers’ earnings are being set aside to pay for previously-accrued pension liabilities. This amounts to a large reduction in real operating spending per student. Our findings make clear that a significant fraction of the resources allocated toward teacher compensation in current public education budgets is not being invested in resources to educate today’s students at all.
August 2016 Update; Originally posted November 2015
Keywords: Teacher Pension, Finance, Retirement
Citation: Benjamin Backes, Dan Goldhaber, Cyrus Grout, Cory Koedel, Shawn Ni, Michael Podgursky, P. Brett Xiang, Zeyu Xu (2016). Benefit or Burden? On the Intergenerational Inequity of Teacher Pension Plans. CALDER Working Paper No. 148
You May Also Be Interested In
The Impact of a $10,000 Bonus on Special Education Teacher Shortages in Hawai‘i
Roddy Theobald, Zeyu Xu, Allison Gilmour, Lisa Lachlan-Hache, Liz Bettini, Nathan Jones
The Long and Winding Road: Mapping the College and Employment Pathways to Teacher Education Program Completion in Washington State
Dan Goldhaber, John Krieg, Stephanie Liddle, Roddy Theobald
The Effects of Comprehensive Educator Evaluation and Pay Reform on Achievement
Eric Hanushek, Jin Luo, Andrew Morgan, Minh Nguyen, Ben Ost, Steven Rivkin, Ayman Shakeel
See other working papers on:
Research Area: Educator preparation and teacher labor markets