You are here
Value-Added Models and the Measurement of Teacher Productivity
Research on teacher productivity, and recently developed accountability systems for teachers, rely on value-added models to estimate the impact of teachers on student performance. The authors test many of the central assumptions required to derive value-added models from an underlying structural cumulative achievement model and reject nearly all of them. Moreover, they find that teacher value added and other key parameter estimates are highly sensitive to model specification. While estimates from commonly employed value-added models cannot be interpreted as causal teacher effects, employing richer models that impose fewer restrictions may reduce the bias in estimates of teacher productivity.
Keywords: Accountability, Value added, Teacher Productivity
Citation: Douglas Harris, Tim Sass, Anastasia Semykina (2010). Value-Added Models and the Measurement of Teacher Productivity. CALDER Working Paper No. 54
You May Also Be Interested In
How Did It Get This Way? Disentangling the Sources of Teacher Quality Gaps Through Agent-Based Modeling
Dan Goldhaber, Matt Kasman, Vanessa Quince, Roddy Theobald, Malcolm Wolff
Teachers and School Climate: Effects on Student Outcomes and Academic Disparities
Benjamin Backes, James Cowan, Dan Goldhaber, Roddy Theobald
How Well Do Professional Reference Ratings Predict Teacher Performance?
Dan Goldhaber, Cyrus Grout, Malcolm Wolff