You are here
Overview of Measuring Effect Sizes: The Effect of Measurement Error
This research brief estimates the overall extent of test measurement error and how this varies across students using New York City student- level longitudinal data across grades 3-8 from 1999- 2007. Results reinforce the importance of accounting for measurement error, as it meaningfully increases effect size estimates associated with teacher attributes. There are important differences in teacher effectiveness that are systematically related to observed teacher attributes. Such effects are important in the formulation and implementation of personnel policies. Also, effect sizes as traditionally measured have led analysts to understate the magnitudes of effects because the standard deviation of observed scores overstates the dispersion of true achievement in the student population.
Keywords: Test Measurement Error, Teacher Effectiveness, Effect Sizes
Citation: Donald Boyd, Pamela Grossman, Hamilton Lankford, Susanna Loeb, James Wyckoff (2008). Overview of Measuring Effect Sizes: The Effect of Measurement Error. CALDER Policy Brief No. 200-1108
You May Also Be Interested In
Impacts of Academic Recovery Interventions on Student Achievement in 2022-23
Maria V. Carbonari, Michael DeArmond, Daniel Dewey, Elise Dizon-Ross, Dan Goldhaber, Thomas J. Kane, Anna McDonald, Andrew McEachin, Emily Morton, Atsuko Muroga, Alejandra Salazar, Douglas O. Staiger
A Descriptive Portrait of the Paraeducator Workforce in Washington State
Roddy Theobald, Lindsey Kaler, Elizabeth Bettini, Nathan Jones
Academic Mobility in U.S. Public Schools: Evidence from Nearly 3 Million Students
Wes Austin, David Figlio, Dan Goldhaber, Eric Hanushek, Tara Kilbride, Cory Koedel, Jaeseok Sean Lee, Jin Luo, Umut Özek, Eric Parsons, Steven Rivkin, Tim Sass, Katharine O. Strunk
See other working papers on:
Research Area: Other