You are here
Overview of Measuring Effect Sizes: The Effect of Measurement Error
This research brief estimates the overall extent of test measurement error and how this varies across students using New York City student- level longitudinal data across grades 3-8 from 1999- 2007. Results reinforce the importance of accounting for measurement error, as it meaningfully increases effect size estimates associated with teacher attributes. There are important differences in teacher effectiveness that are systematically related to observed teacher attributes. Such effects are important in the formulation and implementation of personnel policies. Also, effect sizes as traditionally measured have led analysts to understate the magnitudes of effects because the standard deviation of observed scores overstates the dispersion of true achievement in the student population.
Keywords: Test Measurement Error, Teacher Effectiveness, Effect Sizes
Citation: Donald Boyd, Pamela Grossman, Hamilton Lankford, Susanna Loeb, James Wyckoff (2008). Overview of Measuring Effect Sizes: The Effect of Measurement Error. CALDER Working Paper No.
You May Also Be Interested In
Estimating Test-Score Growth with a Gap Year in the Data
Ishtiaque Fazlul, Cory Koedel, Eric Parsons, Cheng Qian
Is Online a Better Baseline? Comparing the Predictive Validity of Computer- and Paper-Based Tests
Benjamin Backes, James Cowan